The press has a real problem distinguishing pseudo science from real science and rarely has anyone trained in science reporting on science.

The same can be said of computer reporting (Except in specialized magazines) Religion and a host of other specialties.

What most reporting does is look for the hook or the grab line that will grab every ones attention and use it as a come on, while the full story might say something opposite.

The majors (print and broadcast) tend to do a little better job of it, but often times present a one sided view.

I prefer when they talk about medical science (religion you name the speciality) to bring in a practicing doctor (same for other specialities) to discuss the current findings. Usually they will do a well balanced report of what seems to be a headline but is in reality just normal news.

Stewart


At 05:40 PM 4/25/2007, you wrote:
According to information from the "To the Point" program today, the suspicion about possible cell phone induced causes of bee disappearances was not intended to be the focus, and was not the finding of any study. Even high power electricity transmission lines appear to only be something of an electrical shock hazard if a bee comes too close to the wires, or something like that.

So, I am left to wonder how the press and other reports got it all wrong. Is there possibly some spin now being applied to the results of the studies as a form of backpedaling to avoid the possibility of an overly anxious public? If so, it would not be the first time. But, it remains more probable that pesticides and other man-created causes are the primary factors, to include genetic crop modifications. There could be more than one cause as well.

  Steve

Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace
Ozark, AL  SL 82


************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************

Reply via email to