Weren't you supposed to change the topic to 'slam newspaper cause it
doesn't
agree with my idealogical bias' ?
That may well be true, but do you know anyone that feels they can trust the
reporting of Washington Times, or who believes that Fox News is "fair and
balanced"?
The problems are not that every reporter is biased, in fact there are very
good news reporters in both organizations. The problems are in how they are
managed.
Nobody in DC, except a few transient politicians, takes the Washington
Times seriously. Hardly anybody buys it. In all the years since Sun
Myung Moon started the WT, it has NEVER made a profit. It can't. It has
fake news, few readers, and not enough advertising. They make up their
stories, then "report" them. At least the fake news papers in the UK
aren't taken seriously, and they have pinups on page 3, why not WT, too?
Fake WT newspapers in DC are mostly ignored. The freebie WaPo at the
metro stops has more readers, and more news.
Betty
************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************
