This might not be the best newsgroup to answer this question, but here goes.
I was asked to make a compilation of selected music from several CDs for a single new CD. (These were locally recorded, not copyrighted, and a single "master" CD was made of each performance.) So I used Exact Audio Copy, http://www.exactaudiocopy.de/, a program that professes to eliminate all sources of errors if possible in ripping a CD (with multiple error checks, including reading each audio sector on the CD at least twice and up to 50 times) and then converts to a WAV file stored on hard disk. From the WAV file I burn the compilation to a new CD with Nero.
Listener says that copy has lower audio quality than the original, so he will have to hire a professional to do the same.
Question: is it possible to lose quality when ripping and re-recording as I've described?
************************************************************************ * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <== * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <== * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml * Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived ************************************************************************
