>So the author describes security on both machines as having to force user >input to allow changes, but only the mac guy is smart enough to hit cancel? >Ridiculous. Vista gains a critical area in security and apparently it's not >*exactly* as on a mac so it's a complete failure?
I often encounter situations where an observer is unable to distinguish the difference between a good design and a bad design. They look and they look. They scratch their heads and say "looks the same to me." This is often the case with Microsoft products. They copy somebody else's work, but miss the essence of it. I guess this is one of those situations and you are one of those observers. OS X is very good at only asking for verification when a serious situation is at hand. Vista drives people nuts with useless prompts. No, it is not the same. There is a big difference. ************************************************************************ * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <== * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <== * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml * Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived ************************************************************************
