>Here ya go Tommy. Learn something. >http://www.it-observer.com/pdf/dl/windows_vista_security.pdf
Thanks for proving my point. Vista actually looks worse than I expected. This amply illustrates what happens when security gets bolted on as an afterthought. The paper's point is that Vista security has to be swiss cheese in order not to break many existing applications. They specifically compare it to the stronger security of UNIX, which is the security model the Mac uses (OS X = BSD UNIX). ************************************************************************ * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <== * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <== * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml * Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived ************************************************************************
