Yes, but Time machine is still a local backup device... which few will ever... despite good intentions ... remove from the premises. When so many's essential biz is being done and stored on computer, not having fail-safe backup is nonsensical. Determining the security of the backup by the brand of backup drive that is sitting next to your computer completely misses the point.

It's like going sailing over the Atlantic ocean with emergency flares but without a life raft/ enough life rafts. Any backup, such as Time Machine which occurs only locally, just ignores such real perils as theft, lightning strike, fire, flood, earthquake and operator error.

Such short sighted backup solutions aren't really solutions at all ... just falsely self-comforting hooey ... as so many on the Titanic paid the ultimate price to learn. Institutions are increasingly using incremental backup to drive solutions similar in technique to the Time Machine but they are doing so not only with redundant RAID backup drives but they locate the backup drives remotely and those two aspects are the two most important aspects of the setup.

Online backup may not be cheap enough for some yet (although S3 seems pretty reasonable to me...) but my bet is it is the future of backup for everyone but the largest institutions

I would be interested to know if anyone has experience with any other than S3 ?

db

Tom Piwowar wrote:
The nice thing about using a hard drive as backup media is that incremental backups are consolidated (by copying new/newer files) into a directory tree that is current and complete. Copying can be with or without "replicating deletions" so that old stuff can be preserved in the backup. The backup can be readily tested, since the files appear on an ordinary hard drive. And it is quick to find and restore a single file or two.

I'm looking forward to seeing how Apple's TimeMachine changes my backup routine.


************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************



************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************

Reply via email to