I pointed them to the RFC for JPEG noting that the core spec does not mention any linear measure.
>That's interesting, because I'm not aware of any format that reliably >keeps track of this figure. Did you have to start scanning at that or >did you find software that would just change the value? > >On Jan 4, 2008 2:34 PM, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >PS "dpi" is a printing term, not _really_ relative to either stills or >video. >> >> Yes indeed. There are only dots. I just got put through the wringer by an >> IT Dept genius who insisted that the jpegs I delever had to be 96 dpi >> (Microsoft told him so). ************************************************************************ * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <== * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <== * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml * Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived ************************************************************************
