I do not think I am mistaking two different sets of privacy.
Privacy guarantees as pertaining to my "personal information" is
exactly what could have been violated by Verizon in their collusion
with the NSA.
"Could have?" That's a weak argument as far as evidence that
Verizon "colluded" with the NSA. The NSA doesn't need Verizon
to get in your shorts.
Demonizing a perfectly good telco is probably a bad strategy.
At Verizon, I've had the opportunity to work with a very diverse
community of very professional people. We take the whole privacy
issue very seriously.
So seriously that there are requred courses on this. For all management
people.
I don't think I'm excessively stupid, some may disagree.
************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************
