On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:57:18 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Imagine if Wikipedia were to display graphic images of sex acts on >its home page. This may sound ludicrous, but to some Muslims, a >graphic depiction of the Prophet is equally offensive.
That *does* sound ludicrous. What's so offensive about sex acts? (-: Hey! I'm just kiddin'! -- R:\katan ------------------------------------------------------------ Tea. . .Earl Grey. . .Hot ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
