>Yes, I read the story. The numbers speak for themselves. Out of a >company presumably of thousands, 19 wanted to run Windows on Mac >hardware.
Tony wrote out of "presumably of thousands, 19" when actually it was 19 out of 22 that favored the Mac. Tony wrote they "wanted to run Windows on Mac" when nothing of the kind was in the report. The mention of Windows was in the context of providing a safety net just in case they had to run something that only ran on Windows. While such software does exist we all know that is an unlikely. There is plenty of Mac software to meet virtually any need. The only problem software is the stuff specifically written to be incompatable and that stuff is usually of very low quality. I guess Tony thinks we are too stupid to notice the difference. The way Tony spins the facts to his own bizarre view looks like a political spinmeister, not like someone looking objectively at technical facts. ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
