BTW, single drive sustained data write is nowhere near fast enough to write HD. You seem to think we're just talking about size of the drives, RAID is not just about size.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID Something for you to read about RAID in case you need a refresher. Mike On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm going to disagree with both of you. > > For video work, with high-transfer rate, 1TB SATA drives selling for > peanuts, there is little reason for using a RAID. A TB is more than > enough to store 3 hours of uncompressed 24p 1920x1080 (HD) video. With > storage virtualization/replication you can span multiple physical volumes > to create larger virtual volumes. So there is no need to bother with > creaky old RAID. > > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
