>But she's already got it and otherwise is not interested in $$$ for >something else...the opera client is a little clunky but cud doo...eh?
So you are a Redmund dead-ender? Outlook costs $$$. The better alternatives are free, either advertising supported or open source. Yet you describe them as $$$ and you cling to MS's buggy behemoth from the last century. There is also the $$$ of having to maintain Outlook's quaint and fragile database. MS puts everything in one humongous file that needs to be regularly verified and compressed. Hit a serious glitch and lose absolutely everything. ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
