> Infection estimates now at 10,000,0000 and "spreading fast." > > Just close your eyes, click you heels together, and recite "Windows is > double plus good. There is nothing to worry about."
The point being made was in reference to your statement that "[MS]'s inability, after years of promising, to produce a secure operating system is a significant failure." Out of the box, Vista is not vulnerable to this attack. This is very clear from Symantec's stats as well as from MS's discussion of the last October's XP patch. Don't you feel that this sorta argues against what you said? Even a little? Now, you're going to quote me as insisting that Vista is 100% secure. Please don't. It isn't. But this incident makes the opposite of the point you used it to make. ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
