>Anyway, it was Tom who made the initial comparison. I was just pointing out >that his conclusion conflicts with his verdict in the case of PC v. Mac. In >the case of computers, quality is what's important (so MS loses). In the >case of games, it's sales that are important (so MS loses).
Except I would say that the quality of the Wii is superior to the XBox. I only brought up sales figures to give the WFBs an opportunity to admit that sales numbers are not what is important. Th Wii is superior because it is a better design and a more clever use of technology. The MS product is just more dumb iron. The design philosophy is that bigger, bulkier, and speedier is all that counts. Not creativity and brains. ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
