I suppose my definition of success differs from the WFBs; I actually mean success. I cannot think of anything Ballmer has done well at. He inherited the reigns of a moneyed company; does it have more money now? MS spent longer than ever to update its OS, and it is blasted for Vista; it is now rushing to replace vista with W7. It announced the zune to no applause. Has MS done _anything_ successfully with Ballmer at the helm?
Thank you, Mark Snyder -----Original Message----- Well that depends on your definition of success. Are you saying Ballmer is a failure where Jobs is not? For not having any traits for the tech world, he's done well. ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
