You are reaching; your splitting hairs, fishing for excuses to attack are evident. Sheesh: "dedicated to weaselly ways."
Why not give this topic a rest? Thank you, Mark Snyder -----Original Message----- > Time and time again we have magazines and blogs that tear down and > price Mac PCs vs. Windows PCs and demonstrate exactly that: comparable > machines have comparable prices. Yet the WFBs keep insisting that they > are cheap and that cheap is a virtue. So wrong and so tiresome. Only someone dedicated to weaselly ways could claim such a comparison as legitimate. You can't compare a monolithic brand to a "polylithic" brand get a coherent result, unless, of course, your intention is to cook the books for a lopsided result. See "1.7% profit margins." Now, if you were to run a comparison of Apple vs. Dell, or Apple vs. Lenovo, then you'd have the basis a reasonable test. The rest is blowing much smoke up many asses. ************************************************************************ * ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** ************************************************************************ * ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
