Yah..did that, twice. I kept reading thinking you usually don't make things up from whole cloth, you twist the story around to fit your view. I still see nothing in the article containing cons, neocons..libertarians, liberals, leftists, microsfticons, greens, reds, watermelons...perhaps you can send the full text and highlight in crayon where any or all of these terms are contained.
Might also want to pay better attention, I've seen you call Mark, Mike, or vice versa...or attributing things said by one user to another.. Also, I didn't start the thread about broken links, nor did I even contribute. I know reading these emails is such a chore, so much easier to just make someone say something they didn't and then respond to it I suppose. On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:29 AM, t.piwowar <t...@tjpa.com> wrote: > On Jun 26, 2009, at 12:56 PM, mike wrote: > >> I know I'll regret asking...how do you link your made up political >> bogeymen >> to this? >> > > The way it works Mike is that you are supposed to click on the link and > read the cited web page. > > I know, I know, reading is such a chore. So much easier to just type > something nonsensical. > > Are you still claiming that all your links is broke? > > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
