On Jun 25, 2009, at 4:16 PM, Jeff Wright wrote:
Why am I not surprised that you found a trivial and largely
meaningless nit
to pick with a MS product?
Here is a good before-after example of what M$ has done to HTML
rendering of emails...
http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-
non-compliant/
WFBs will insist they see no difference or that they like the "after"
version better.
The rest of us will weep. M$ does it to us again. How long before
they try to charge extra for an "enhanced" version that is not as
badly broken?
*************************************************************************
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
*************************************************************************