> But it is not their market. When any large corporation makes anti- > competitive actions it damages the market. If the damage is slight we > let it pass. If the damage is major we go after the bastards.
Define "anti-competitive" please. Objectively, if you would, not EU-style where the technocrats and the competitors define it by what they say it is. > The market belongs to us collectively and > it is a collective responsibility to protect it. This is just flat out wrong. No one "owns" a market. You are expressing propriety where none exists. How do you own an abstract concept? If anything, you own only your little slice, where you decide what to do with your money. > When we fail to do > that we risk market meltdowns like we now have, which is due to the > failure of financial market regulators and likely corrupt > administration intervention in support of the bad guys. Imagine how > unlivable it would be if the current market meltdown were repeated > every year or two. Then don't bail out the bad actors. They won't be around to screw up again the next time. You also might stop printing trillions of dollars of money that we don't have. Use your wheelbarrow in the garden, not the bank. ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
