Not sure why you're flailing on this. Mac OS 10.6, Snow Leopard, can be set to load 64-bit, every time, if desired, or left to the default, to load the 32-bit kernel. Windows users must install one or the other. This is not a huge difference. Why split hairs? I like Apple's approach; if I need to use 32-bit kernel to work with older software, I can, and can switch when 32-bit is no longer needed. M$ does provide 32-bit or 64-bit. This is at installation, but I don't slam them for that. Why the nit-picking?
Thank you, Mark Snyder -----Original Message----- No matter how you slice and dice it, the fact remains that Vista and Win7 are fully 64-bit out of the box, including the kernel. I don't have any problem with Macs, but I do love how you manage to claim that defaulting to the 32-bit version of a critical component is somehow a big advantage over 64-bit Windows, and a sign of superior engineering. ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
