It does, it would have tested the capacity of any network, but verizon's 3g covers a much larger swathe then and now compared to ATT. There have been articles out about with the new smartphones coming out, phones less painful to browse the web, that all the networks are going to be pushed.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Wayne Dernoncourt <way...@panix.com> wrote: > Rev. Stewart Marshall > <trying to drag this back to 'puters - sort of> > > Verizon also did not want to be stuck with the > > problems. From what I understood Apple wanted > > everything but was willing to give nothing. > > Verizon said we wont play that game. > > I'm not so sure that it wasn't more that Verizon and > Apple wanted opposite ends of the control spectrum. > They both wanted to control the platform, I don't > know who walked or if AT&T wanted the same thing and > blinked first. > > > So Apple approached ATT and ATT jumped at the deal > > because they needed a way to bring more folks in. > > (Sounds a lot like deceptive marketing to me). > > How much worse was AT&T's network that Verizon's at the > iPhone intro? As I understand it, the iPhone eats data > service like candy. > > -- > Take care | This clown speaks for himself, his job doesn't > Wayne D. | supply this, at least not directly > Whip me, beat me, make me write BASIC! > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
