On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:19 AM, mike <xha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hope?  Stupidity?
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 4:17 AM, phartz...@gmail.com 
> <phartz...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Stewart Marshall
>> <revsamarsh...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Try breaking a contract with ATT on your new Iphone and see how much they
>> > will charge you.
>>
>>   Why would anyone agree to a contractual arrangement wherein without
>> even being able to EFFECTIVELY test the product, the user would be
>> penalized if the product eventually failed to perform as had been
>> anticipated or as advertised?

  Or because they quite simply will not let you have a phone under
contract without such a penalty being included.

  Imagine if all products had to be acquired in a similar manner and
with return or cancellation penalties reaching hundreds of dollars if
said items do not meet expectations or live up to advertising claims?

  Steve


*************************************************************************
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*************************************************************************

Reply via email to