Well there is a lack of technical aspect in the blog post you reference. This is just more trolling, someone trying to make a problem where so far, none exists. Unacceptable? Strong language for something a user has to go out and find, download and install on their own.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Andy Gallant <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/11/2010 2:41 PM, John DeCarlo wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Andy Gallant <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> Any comments or perspectives? >>> >>> - >>> >>> >> I suspect you already know what at least half a dozen people on this site >> will say. >> >> And how likely it is that you will get technical answers and comments on >> this list. >> >> True, but I can hope! And, seriously, I still think this update is worth > asking about, and in particular, how accurate the technical aspects in the > two postings are. > > -Andy > > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
