On 03/07/2010 11:20 PM, mike wrote: > I haven't seen it, but perhaps you have..a definitive statement that the > school thought the laptop was in fact stolen? I keep seeing vague things > like 'security was used in case it was missing or stolen', but never that in > this case they had turned it on because of that. And again, if it was > stolen by this kid why was only the 'drugs' brought up to the parents?
If you check the news story from the Philadelphia Inquirer, you'll note that because a $55 insurance fee wasn't paid, the laptop was supposed to remain in school. The laptop was instead taken home and apparently some form of inventory occurred which lead to discovering that said laptop was missing. You'll note that there is no disputing that the laptop in question was removed from the school without permission. http://www.philly.com/philly/news/homepage/86505452.html ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
