Michael Curran schrieb: > Hi, > > Thanks for the explanation. If comtypes is already using the [] syntax > for early bound interfaces, and if that is the most suitable way, then > that sounds ok to me. I agree that it is important to keep dyn dispatch > interfaces as compatible with early bound interfaces as possible. > > So, I also in that case do also think that __call__ should be > implemented. In order so that named properties with optional or needed > arguments can be called with () for getting, even though you could also > use the [] syntax as well. > In our projects, and I suspect others, comtypes early bound propgets > with arguments are called with (), I never new about [].
Hm, I didn't remember it but property access syntax IS even documented for quite some time here: http://starship.python.net/crew/theller/comtypes/#accessing-properties Besides that, I have now in the dyndispatch-branch added the call syntax to get properties, and extended the __getitem__ and __setitem__ calls so that [...] property access (both get and put) works with one or more arguments, in the same way as the early bound case. Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ comtypes-users mailing list comtypes-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/comtypes-users
