> According to my compiler, it is. :) You're thinking PRE-ANSI. Like K&R > original C. Nope. I'm not. Take a look at 'Wiki': http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_C http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_(programming_language)
I don't want to start a discussion about C-Standards but these are the ones I was referring to: a) ANSI-C (The first "Standard"). That's what I'm talking about and Microsoft supports. Sometimes called C89 or C90 (because of the ANSI-C standard formed in 1989 and the ISO/IEC standard in 1990) b) C99. New ANSI-C standard with the extensions you used (or better: were inherited from your former c++ source). That's what Microsoft does not support up to now (Your right at this point: "f*cking MS" :-). > ANSI added lots to the language even before c99 came along. I don't think so. There are only two 'official' standards: C89/C90 and C99. > However, there were about 25 errors when I turned on strict ANSI checking > which I've fixed and committed. Give it a whirl and email me any errors. Ok. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
