Stephen Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The following is extracted purely from firmware files and USB logs, from
> both Kevin's zip and my upgrade attempts:

My "LatestFirmware.EZUp" contains the following hint:

        <NOTINTENDED>
                <VERSION>
                        <!-- Cant be used for 745 architecture -->
                        <ARCHITECTURE>2</ARCHITECTURE>
                </VERSION>
[...]
        </NOTINTENDED>

So, the 745 indeed seems to be one of the first remotes and its architecture
is No. 2.
 
My 525 belongs in your table like this:

> remote, arch, fw version, d/l pattern, write pattern
525 9 2.6.0(?) 8xFF 22ecffff4847fffF

The version number is determined from the string "Upgrading 525 Application 
firmware to version 2.6.0 (20071123_162735)".

A shot in the dark: The LatestFirmware.EZUp specifies "<SKIN>22</SKIN>" which
is - when interpreted as a hex value - the same as the first byte. It
probably is a bogus conclusion though since other hex values in the XML
part are prefixed with "0x".

Bye,
        Simon
-- 
              [EMAIL PROTECTED]              http://simon.budig.de/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
concordance-devel mailing list
concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel

Reply via email to