On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:01:49AM -0700, Zach Carter wrote: > On Sunday 16 March 2008 12:05:18 am Phil Dibowitz wrote: > > Does "concordance -r" give you the same thing? I'm guessing it will. > > Nope. '-r' works like a charm. > > > If not, > > you can add further debugging by recompiling and defining _DEBUG symbol > > (instead of "make" do: "CPPFLAGS=-D_DEBUG make" > > After setting up the D_DEBUG flag, I got this. The reboot seemed to work > fine.
OK, reset_remote is what's returning -19 on you. That's odd since it's just a USB write. We can double check this with a few printf()s, but I'm wondering if maybe the remote doesn't ACK the write because it's rebooting already or something... maybe we have to not rely on the return value from there. Just to confirm I can send you a debug patch when I get back to confirm, but the code path is very straight forward if you want to dig in before that. -- Phil Dibowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Open Source software and tech docs Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ "Never write it in C if you can do it in 'awk'; Never do it in 'awk' if 'sed' can handle it; Never use 'sed' when 'tr' can do the job; Never invoke 'tr' when 'cat' is sufficient; Avoid using 'cat' whenever possible" -- Taylor's Laws of Programming
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
