Phil Dibowitz wrote: > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 03:02:40PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> The attached patch adds a field to the remote info structure that tells >> the code where to put the 4847 byte sequence in firmware images when >> programming them. > > What's with the UINT32_MAX holder? There's already lots of un-filled-in bits > in that table and clearly a mechanism for it: 0.
I was avoiding the possibility of offset 0 being perfectly valid. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
