On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:40:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > Stephen Warren wrote: > > I notice there's no COPYING file anywhere in CVS. I believe SW under the > > GPL is supposed to include a copy (sic) of COPYING somewhere for > > reference... > > Oh, it is there, just called license.txt. I'd suggest it be renamed for > consistency with other projects (since there's no history, probably not > need to involve SF; just delete/re-add).
Ah, I see. It should either be called "LICENSE" or "COPYING", but 'license.txt' is a bit obscure. > Also, I notice that about 1/2 the files in libconcord are GPL v2 or > later and the others are GPL v3 or later. Is this intentional. Does that > make the package as a whole GPLv3+ then? No, it's all v3+, that's a mistake. I'll fix. -- Phil Dibowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Open Source software and tech docs Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ "Never write it in C if you can do it in 'awk'; Never do it in 'awk' if 'sed' can handle it; Never use 'sed' when 'tr' can do the job; Never invoke 'tr' when 'cat' is sufficient; Avoid using 'cat' whenever possible" -- Taylor's Laws of Programming
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
