On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:07:29PM -0000, Kevin Wright wrote: > Oh definitely, getting these to work would be a big win for concordance :)
Yup, it's definitely high on my list. I had a contact at Logitech for a while I was hoping was going to be able to get specs for them, but that fell through last week, unfortunately. Since firmware support for non-zwave remotes is *mostly* working, I wanted to just finish that up, get the final bugs worked out, and then I can concentrate all my time on making the basics (read: config updates) work on the zwave remotes. The z-wave remotes definitely need to be supported, no question. We've just had a lot of trouble reverse-engineering the protocol. Anything you can find is welcome! -- Phil Dibowitz p...@ipom.com Open Source software and tech docs Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ "Never write it in C if you can do it in 'awk'; Never do it in 'awk' if 'sed' can handle it; Never use 'sed' when 'tr' can do the job; Never invoke 'tr' when 'cat' is sufficient; Avoid using 'cat' whenever possible" -- Taylor's Laws of Programming
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
