On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 06:58:49PM +0100, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:38:48AM -0500, Douglas E. Warner wrote:
> > Here we go; attached gen_udev_support script.
> 
> OK, changes I've made to your patch:
> 
> - Files that are *linked* to (policykit, for example) the files are *not*
>   named 99-.... they are named just libconcord... or whatever since the
>   Makefile targets than link to them appropriately.

I actually made all of them not have 99-*. I don't think th escript should
choose their install place. Either the Makefile or perhaps the
specfile/debconf/etc. should do that. And in fact, the Makefile.am committed
does that.

I wasn't clear on where the policykit file goes. I'm nearly certain I have it
going to the wrong place.

Doug, can you test the checked in code? You should want "make policykit" and
"make install_policykit"

Thanks!
-- 
Phil Dibowitz                             p...@ipom.com
Open Source software and tech docs        Insanity Palace of Metallica
http://www.phildev.net/                   http://www.ipom.com/

"Never write it in C if you can do it in 'awk';
 Never do it in 'awk' if 'sed' can handle it;
 Never use 'sed' when 'tr' can do the job;
 Never invoke 'tr' when 'cat' is sufficient;
 Avoid using 'cat' whenever possible" -- Taylor's Laws of Programming

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
concordance-devel mailing list
concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel

Reply via email to