On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 06:58:49PM +0100, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:38:48AM -0500, Douglas E. Warner wrote: > > Here we go; attached gen_udev_support script. > > OK, changes I've made to your patch: > > - Files that are *linked* to (policykit, for example) the files are *not* > named 99-.... they are named just libconcord... or whatever since the > Makefile targets than link to them appropriately.
I actually made all of them not have 99-*. I don't think th escript should choose their install place. Either the Makefile or perhaps the specfile/debconf/etc. should do that. And in fact, the Makefile.am committed does that. I wasn't clear on where the policykit file goes. I'm nearly certain I have it going to the wrong place. Doug, can you test the checked in code? You should want "make policykit" and "make install_policykit" Thanks! -- Phil Dibowitz p...@ipom.com Open Source software and tech docs Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ "Never write it in C if you can do it in 'awk'; Never do it in 'awk' if 'sed' can handle it; Never use 'sed' when 'tr' can do the job; Never invoke 'tr' when 'cat' is sufficient; Avoid using 'cat' whenever possible" -- Taylor's Laws of Programming
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
