On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Chain von den Keiya wrote: >> OK, I'll take a look at that later to see if I can sort out what might be >> wrong. >> >> Just for kicks, do you want to try the attached patch? This basically >> removes the extra headers that we are adding for your particular >> architecture of remote and just uses the standard ones that most of the >> other remotes use. > > Okay, thanks. I tried the patch, but it doesn't apply against 1.0. > > Or shouldn't I be using this version?
Whoops, sorry, that patch was against git master - Phil did a massive whitespace cleanup after 1.0, so that's probably why it didn't apply. > However, I changed the code myself. And guess what: > > IT WORKS! > > It downloaded a ZUpdate.hcu file, I ran it with congruity, and all is well > now. Time to shut down Windows ;) Thanks a lot. I hope this information will > come in handy ;) Awesome! I added those extra headers when I was doing development for the 900, but I guess they aren't needed after all. I'll take a look at what you sent and see if I can sort out the problem with the headers. If not, maybe I'll just propose dropping them. Scott ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
