On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:49, Brad Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
> However, concurrency-sig might be a good home for more in-depth > discussions on such topics; currently this list seems dormant. > According to the archive, the last postings were in 2009 about the > GIL. Why not try to reboot this list, and send out an announcement to > call for participation here? I have a number of posts cooking for blog.python.org, but I'll add this to the list of things to put out there.
_______________________________________________ concurrency-sig mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-sig
