On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 11:34:48PM +0200, Arsen Arsenović wrote: > Note: currently, there's no detection method for linux-mlibc in > config.guess, since there's no decided way to detect mlibc. > > Signed-off-by: Arsen Arsenović <ar...@aarsen.me> > --- > config.sub | 2 +- > testsuite/config-sub.data | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/config.sub b/config.sub > index e65e0ac..71222c8 100755 > --- a/config.sub > +++ b/config.sub > @@ -1779,7 +1779,7 @@ esac > # (given a valid OS), if there is a kernel. > case $kernel-$os in > linux-gnu* | linux-dietlibc* | linux-android* | linux-newlib* \ > - | linux-musl* | linux-relibc* | linux-uclibc* ) > + | linux-musl* | linux-relibc* | linux-uclibc* | linux-mlibc* > ) > ;; > uclinux-uclibc* ) > ;; > diff --git a/testsuite/config-sub.data b/testsuite/config-sub.data > index ac06881..9ec5368 100644 > --- a/testsuite/config-sub.data > +++ b/testsuite/config-sub.data > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ aarch64-bme > aarch64-unknown-bme > aarch64-elf aarch64-unknown-elf > aarch64-genode aarch64-unknown-genode > aarch64-linux > aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > +aarch64-linux-mlibc aarch64-unknown-linux-mlibc > aarch64-managarm aarch64-unknown-managarm-mlibc > aarch64-managarm-kernel > aarch64-unknown-managarm-kernel > aarch64-managarm-mlibc > aarch64-unknown-managarm-mlibc > @@ -618,6 +619,7 @@ riscv-company-elf > riscv-company-elf > riscv-company-hcos riscv-company-hcos > riscv-elf riscv-unknown-elf > riscv-linux riscv-unknown-linux-gnu > +riscv-linux-mlibc riscv-unknown-linux-mlibc > riscv-managarm > riscv-unknown-managarm-mlibc > riscv-managarm-kernel > riscv-unknown-managarm-kernel > riscv-managarm-mlibc riscv-unknown-managarm-mlibc
Applied, thanks. > @@ -848,6 +850,7 @@ x86_64-fuchsia > x86_64-pc-fuchsia > x86_64-genode x86_64-pc-genode > x86_64-glidix x86_64-pc-glidix > x86_64-linux-relibc x86_64-pc-linux-relibc > +x86_64-linux-mlibc x86_64-pc-linux-mlibc This hunk has been amended to keep the file sorted. -- ldv