Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62...@gmail.com> writes: > I said "with only 3-or-4-of-5 elements present"; that using all 5 > elements is currently invalid does not change that we effectively > /have/ 5 elements, with a restriction that only 3 or 4 of them can > actually be present in any one tuple. > > > -- Jacob
And my point was that you're suffering from a bout of pareidolia...
