Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62...@gmail.com> writes: > There are several GNU/Linux distributions that either use or can use > musl libc already. (See: > <URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Musl&oldid=1164590075>) > Musl libc does not have the same features as GNU libc, so it is > rightly a different ABI target, however, the system is still a GNU > variant, so its configure tuple should still match *-gnu-* for the > same reasons that the GNU project wants to call the overall system > GNU/Linux.
These systems are not GNU/Linux systems, since they don't incorporate the GNU libc; this particularly applies to Autoconf users, since they will not have access to extensions furnished by the GNU libc. >> To top it all off, considerations for such systems affect the entire GNU >> project, and config cannot unilaterally ordain decisions regarding their >> treatment. config-patches is definitely the wrong mailing list. > > OK then, what is the right mailing list? gnu-system-discuss, maybe?
