OK here we go:
1. https://github.com/ericson2314/gnu-config/commit/windows-mingnu.patch
2. https://github.com/ericson2314/gnu-config/commit/windows-mingw.patch
3. https://github.com/ericson2314/gnu-config/commit/no-windows-gnu.patch
I tried to honestly argue for each of them the best I could in the
commit message. I know I prefer (1); I am guessing Jacob prefers (2),
and Po Lu prefers (3).
Have fun, Dmitry :).
I suppose rather than just idly speculating on how nice it would be to
standardize with LLVM, this might be a good time to actually post to
their Discourse instance and solicit feedback. If anyone else agrees I
will happily do so.
Cheers,
John
On 9/11/23 17:55, John Ericson wrote:
I can submit two patches (effectively amending my prior, landed patch)
with options that I think people would prefer. Will do that shortly.
On 9/11/23 17:53, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:11:39AM +0800, Po Lu wrote:
Where are the config maintainers? Karl Barry and company?
(I don't remember his e-mail nor do I have it at hand.)
I would expect them to be actively reading this list, but instead my
original request has been left twisting in the wind.
I'm the maintainer and I'm actively reading this list now,
a bit surprised to find so many messages at this time of year. :)
Apparently, you don't quite like commit
91f6a7f616b161c25ba2001861a40e662e18c4ad that added
$cpu-$vendor-windows-{gnu,msvc} support to config.sub, but I'm not sure
I understood what exactly do you suggest to change in this case.
