Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page there are 290 links and it > takes 12.3 to load with link-numbering turned off, and 22.5 seconds with > link numbering on. 10.2 s difference per 290 links is 35 ms per link. > Isn't that really too much? In 35 ms a mechanical hard disk can do 4 > random accesses, and it takes the same amount of time just to display 1 > 3-digit number on the screen?
The numbered linking is very slow. If you can come up with a faster version I and many others would be very greatful! One possibility would be to run a seperate thread that did the numbered linking. But presumably there are some optimizations that could be made to the existing numbered links. -Shawn _______________________________________________ Conkeror mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
