Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] for any given functionality implemented by a greasemonkey > script, there is almost certainly a much cleaner and nicer way to > implement it directly as a Conkeror module.
While I don't dispute that, somebody has to then go to the work of writing and maintaining that module -- and there are (presumably) Conkeror users out there who can't (or don't want to) do that much yak shaving. _______________________________________________ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
