John J Foerch <[email protected]> writes: > Conkeror is a pretty good name. It has a nice sound to it, and > the word origin gives it a classical feeling.
I agree; Conkeror is a good name; it's much more searchable than any other decent name that has been proposed so far. Obviously it was deliberately named with the same name as an existing browser back at its inception, and I think this hints a bit at the playful nature of the project and the community surrounding it. This would be a shame to lose. If you have to refer to it in spoken conversation, "Conkeror with a C" is not too bad, especially considering that it's referred to in written conversation far more often. If the name does have to change, "Conker" would be ideal because it would make the relationship between the new and old names very obvious and be the least disorienting to newcomers who follow links that still refer to "Conkeror". Also, we should get Shawn Betts to chime in on the thread as he is the originator of the project. -Phil _______________________________________________ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
