At Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:03:10 -0500, aditya siram wrote: > > [1 <multipart/alternative (7bit)>] > [1.1 <text/plain; ISO-8859-1 (7bit)>] > > [1.2 <text/html; ISO-8859-1 (quoted-printable)>] > Hi all, > I have been using Conkeror for the past year and I love it! But I > recently tried Opera, and while I like Conkeror better for > usability, Opera is much faster. I tried tweaking all the Firefox > settings, using FasterFox etc, but without much effect. Has anyone > else managed to make Conkeror faster? > This is probably quite subjective, but it seems to be my experience that Conkeror is quite a bit more nifty under GNOME than it is under Fluxbox. I don't understand why, but it could be something to do with GNOME using gtk engines which perhaps involves pre-loading various libraries and stuff... I don't really know.
Richard -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Richard Lewis ISMS, Computing Goldsmiths, University of London Tel: +44 (0)20 7078 5134 Skype: richardjlewis JID: [email protected] http://www.richard-lewis.me.uk/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- +-------------------------------------------------------+ |Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.| |http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html | +-------------------------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
