2009/9/25 Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <[email protected]>: > Jesse Luehrs <[email protected]> writes: > >>> From ab6618459e75aa8c940c0cedeb5c1ba5a43b028a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Jesse Luehrs <[email protected]> >> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:26:45 -0500 >> Subject: [PATCH] handle killing the last buffer a little better > >> replace it with an empty buffer if we aren't allowed to kill it > > This doesn't seem that useful since the only thing you would do with the > new buffer is use it to browse to a different URL, which you could have > done with the existing buffer anyway.
Not entirely true though, since the state of the killed buffer would be wiped (for whatever reason one might have to do so). -- Deniz Dogan _______________________________________________ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
