On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:54:05AM -0400, Tim Ramsey wrote: > I (humbly) propose that a better solution is one that I have been using for > about six months now. That solution involves explicitly naming buffers and > binding keys to go to those named buffers. For lack of imagination I have > called this "single buffer jump". I have included the code from my > .conkerorrc > file below, but in a nutshell it is pretty straightforward. I create a > mapping > between a name and buffer (with URL). I then define some functions that allow > me to either switch to the named buffer or, if it does not exists, open the > URL > in a new (named) buffer. This has two very nice properties. 1) I can bind > keys > to the named buffer, and 2) I do not have to worry whether or not I have a > named buffer open already, if it is open I go there otherwise I create it.
That's a very nice idea. I think though, that we still have to address the issue of the underlying ordering which is reflected in visualizations like the tab bar, the switch-to-buffer completions, and a (not yet in master) list-buffers-buffer. -- John Foerch _______________________________________________ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
