"John J. Foerch" <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:11:07PM +0930, David Kettler wrote: >> This provides summary results such as the following: >> >> % conkeror -q -e 'url_remoting_fn = load;' $PWD/tests/simple/*.js -f >> walnut-summarize >> ... >> Totals: 58 run, 0 failed in 15 suites >> > > Very interesting idea. Could walnut define a command-line switch, instead > of providing an interactive command?
Sure, but I wonder just what you have in mind. We could have an argument that generates the summary: % conkeror -q -e 'url_remoting_fn = load;' $PWD/tests/simple/*.js -walnut-summarize I don't see how that's an improvement though. And it's a bit less flexible; you can only use it on the command line, not in an interactive session. We could have an argument that runs all the following args as tests and then generates the summary: % conkeror -q -walnut-run $PWD/tests/simple/*.js Which has the advantage of being shorter. It would need special support for such an argument slurping handler. It might confuse users if they try to follow that with other args. > Also, would you mind making the patch conform to our whitespace/style > guidelines? Thanks for pointing that out, and sorry for not paying attention to those points before. I wonder if anyone has a configuration for emacs to help with the indentation. Regards, David _______________________________________________ Conkeror mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
