"John J. Foerch" <jjfoe...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 08:32:16PM +0000, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> Axel Beckert <a...@deuxchevaux.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 02:30:00PM -0500, Benjamin Slade wrote:
>> >> On 17 October 2011 11:15, John J. Foerch <jjfoe...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >> > See if Flash is the culprit.
>> >>
>> >> Doesn't seem to be, or, at least, not exclusively. Sometimes it happens
>> >> when
>> >> I go "Back" from a webpage (with no flash on either page).
>> >>
>> >> No-one else is getting this?
>> >
>> > Very seldom, especially compared to what I remember back from my
>> > Firefox times. Conkeror (respectively the xulrunner below it)
>> > segfaults approximately every few weeks to months for me.
>> >
>> > But since we have automatic session saving, that's ok for me --
>> > despite loading 500 to 700 buffers takes some time.
>>
>> Interesting problem. I suffer from it, too. :) I've read a blog post by
>> Mike Hommey where he descripted a feature of or an add‐on for firefox
>> that delays the load of buffers. The session restore would not load a the
>> page, but put there an informal page saying “if you reload this page you
>> get $URL.” A page similar to the one you get if conkeror can not connect
>> to the requested site.
>>
>> This way conkeror would not fetch all the data from the net, but set up
>> buffers with placeholders.
>>
>> Is this something that could be implemented for conkeror?
>>
>
> http://retroj.net/git/conkerorrc/content-delay.js
Amazing! So much features one can imagine are already there.
Bye, Jörg.
--
Wer A sagt, muß nicht B sagen. Er kann auch erkennen, daß A falsch war.
(Erich Kästner)
_______________________________________________
Conkeror mailing list
Conkeror@mozdev.org
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
