Hi, On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 04:37:11PM -0700, Silvio Levy wrote: > I would like to create a separate instance of conkeror for certain > memory-hogging pages, so I can kill it easily when necessary. But > whenever I type "conkeror -no-remote" I get the message > > "conkeror is already running, but is not responding. To open a new > window, you must first close the existing conkeror process, or restart > your system."
I think that's something that changed in Firefox/XULRunner. There are at least two bug reports in Debian about -no-remote having changed in its meaning: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666716 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675544 I suspect that the same counts for Conkeror with XULRunner 10 and higher. Kind regards, Axel -- /~\ Plain Text Ribbon Campaign | Axel Beckert \ / Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News | a...@deuxchevaux.org (Mail) X See http://www.asciiribbon.org/ | a...@noone.org (Mail+Jabber) / \ I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://noone.org/abe/ (Web) _______________________________________________ Conkeror mailing list Conkeror@mozdev.org https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
