------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/GSaulB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
There is 1 message in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Re: vowels: are they necessary?
From: Stephen Mulraney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 00:48:52 +0000
From: Stephen Mulraney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: vowels: are they necessary?
Steven Williams wrote:
> --- # 1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>When a consonant is fricative or trilled, it can be
Well, some of us can only trill for brief periods :(
>>continued as long we want. Is there any languages
>>that has some words that are only consonants without
>>vowels?
> Oh, quite a few. Russian comes to mind; 's' and 'v'
> are both legitimate words (I think they're
> prepositions).
Well, phonologically, they never stand alone (AFAIK).
Indeed, another consonental preposition is 'k'.
Many languages have a syllabic 'r' or
> 'l' (such as Czech, Slovak and Sanskrit).
Or English. (little /litl=/, better /betr=/)
>>A little word that is only a rolled [r], a [s], a
>>[v], without the vowel releasing. It would be
>>conceivable.
>
>
> Indeed. When DVD's first came out, I (jokingly)
> pronounced the acronym as [dv=:d], rather than
> [,di.vi."di:].
>
>
>>Generally, consonant always means that there is
>>vowel pasted to, but why?
I guess the question is, can a phonological segment (a "sound") act as
a syllable peak? If so, surely it's operating as a vowel in the language
in question.
> Generally, most languages have syllabic constraints
> that forbid isolated consonants without vowels. But
> then again, many languages break those very same
> rules; Mandarin, in certain interpretations, has
> syllabic [s], [s`], [s\], [ts], [ts`], [ts\] and [r\].
I don't think any rules is being broken here, simply because (say) [s]
comes from the part of the IPA chart labelled "consonants". As for syllable
constraints, I guess Mandarin is a funny example: there are a limited number
of syllables (414, IIRC) before tone is considered, so I'm not sure if it
makes sense to talk of syllable constraints :)
ObConlang: I once had a conlang idea for a lang that had no "vowels". It had
syllable peaks, of course, but these were mostly fricatives and sonorants.
I think the idea came mainly from the idle phonological babeling I sometimes
engage in while walking. My brief and only first draft for the language had
a lot of words like [fTn] :).
s.
--
Stephen Mulraney [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://livejournal.com/~ataltane
I remember that I tried several times to use a slide rule, and that, several
times also, I began modern maths textbooks, saying to myself that if I were
going slowly, if I read all the lessons all in order, doing the exercises
and all, there was no reason why I should stall -- Georges Perec
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/conlang/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
