------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/GSaulB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

There are 4 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1a. Yasaro writing    
    From: Herman Miller
1b. Re: Yasaro writing    
    From: Roger Mills
1c. Re: Yasaro writing    
    From: Eugene Oh
1d. Re: Yasaro writing    
    From: Tim May


Messages
________________________________________________________________________

1a. Yasaro writing
    Posted by: "Herman Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    Date: Sat Jul 22, 2006 2:55 pm (PDT)

I'm still trying to figure out the history of sound changes in the 
Yasaro language, but I think I have enough to go on for developing the 
Yasaro writing system. I added a brief description on Yasaro writing to 
the FrathWiki page (http://wiki.frath.net/Yasaro) going over some of the 
features of Yasaro spelling based on these historical sound changes. One 
thing I'm wondering: are the angle brackets I used on that page 〈...〉 
the correct characters for a transcription of the way words are written? 
Do they show up correctly in various browsers?

Here's the contents of the text I added to the wiki page:

Yasaro is written using the Lelimi script (Yasaro lelímī "alphabet"), 
which is closely related to the Vlika script. The spelling of native 
Yasaro words is largely based on the pronunciation of an earlier stage 
of the language, Middle Yasaro, while retaining some features of Old 
Yasaro pronunciation. Borrowed words are spelled in various ways 
depending on when the words were borrowed and from which language.

Long vowels in modern Yasaro were still diphthongs in the Middle Yasaro 
period when the spelling conventions were established, so for instance 
/vǐ:la/ "reed organ" is spelled 〈veilá〉, and /čěte:/ "ice" is spelled 
〈tletéu〉. The spelling of /č/ is especially variable; it developed 
from various consonant clusters such as /tl/ and /kr/, as well as /k/ 
before /i/. (Most occurrences of /ki/ in modern Yasaro are from /ke/ in 
Old Yasaro.) Yasaro spelling also preserves syllable-final consonants 
which were lost, as in the words /čâ:ŋa/ 〈krávga〉 "to eat" and /mǐra/ 
〈birás〉 "sun". Double consonants such as 〈ss〉 and 〈hh〉 represent 
lengthened consonants in earlier versions of the language which are 
pronounced as single consonants in the modern language. The name of the 
language itself has one of these double consonants: 〈jassavráň〉.


Messages in this topic (4)
________________________________________________________________________

1b. Re: Yasaro writing
    Posted by: "Roger Mills" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    Date: Sat Jul 22, 2006 5:17 pm (PDT)

Herman Miller wrote:
> One
> thing I'm wondering: are the angle brackets I used on that page 〈...〉
> the correct characters for a transcription of the way words are written?
> Do they show up correctly in various browsers?

Boxes in IE, ? in Firefox. 


Messages in this topic (4)
________________________________________________________________________

1c. Re: Yasaro writing
    Posted by: "Eugene Oh" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    Date: Sat Jul 22, 2006 5:31 pm (PDT)

Boxes in Safari too. Why not just use < and > for simplicity?

2006/7/23, Roger Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Herman Miller wrote:
> > One
> > thing I'm wondering: are the angle brackets I used on that page 〈...〉
> > the correct characters for a transcription of the way words are written?
> > Do they show up correctly in various browsers?
>
> Boxes in IE, ? in Firefox.
>


Messages in this topic (4)
________________________________________________________________________

1d. Re: Yasaro writing
    Posted by: "Tim May" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    Date: Sat Jul 22, 2006 6:04 pm (PDT)

Eugene Oh wrote at 2006-07-23 08:16:35 (+0800) 
 > Boxes in Safari too. Why not just use &lt; and &gt; for simplicity?
 > 
 > 2006/7/23, Roger Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
 > > Herman Miller wrote:
 > > > One
 > > > thing I'm wondering: are the angle brackets I used on that page 〈...〉
 > > > the correct characters for a transcription of the way words are written?
 > > > Do they show up correctly in various browsers?
 > >
 > > Boxes in IE, ? in Firefox.
 > >

You presumably see boxes because you don't have fonts covering these
characters.  They display perfectly in both Firefox and Konqueror.  

I'm not sure that they're the theoretically correct characters to use,
though, Herman - they're in the CJK Symbols & Punctuation block.  I
think what you want is probably 1{) (U+2329) and 1{* (U+232A) (although
they are marked as equivalent... I'm not entirely sure what that means
in this case).


Messages in this topic (4)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/conlang/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply via email to