Mark Graber may be right, but it's a deal fraught with peril.
Dan Pinello's study of gay rights cases finds that the presence of an
anti-sodomy law correlates significantly with anti gay rights decisions
across the board, even after controlling for a wealth of variables that
include judicial ideology, regional ideology, religion, etc.  Judges seem
to be taking a cue from the legislation.

So maybe the real import of this decision is to make lower judges more
amenable to gays who seek custody of children, adoption, etc.








>
Frank Cross
Herbert D. Kelleher Centennial Professor of Business Law
CBA 5.202
University of Texas at Austin
Austin, TX 78712

Reply via email to